- Supplemental Lighting Research for CannabisSupplemental lighting for cannabis production is a hot topic among many growers. More and more manufacturers are offering more and more lights. With so many choices, how do you know … Continue reading “Supplemental Lighting Research for Cannabis”
- Latest PostsContact me!
- Genomic Evidence That Governmentally Produced Cannabis sativa Poorly Represents Genetic Variation Available in State MarketsDaniela Vergara, et al. Published: 14 September 2021 DOI: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.668315/full Question Investigated: Is government medical research into Cannabis using government-specific varieties even applicable to commercially and medically used varieties of … Continue reading “Genomic Evidence That Governmentally Produced Cannabis sativa Poorly Represents Genetic Variation Available in State Markets”
Supplemental Lighting Research for Cannabis
Supplemental lighting for cannabis production is a hot topic among many growers. More and more manufacturers are offering more and more lights. With so many choices, how do you know you’re making the right choice? Does it even matter? And for that matter, what does “supplemental light” even mean? Supplemental lighting specifically refers to adding in more light using an artificial light source, such as high-pressure sodium or other fixtures, when growing plants under a broad-spectrum light, such as the sun. Supplemental lights are commonly used in greenhouse production and are well understood for many crops. Cannabis, however, just hasn’t been legal long enough to build up a strong background of research. With federal legalization of hemp production, opportunities for well-established academic institutions to dive into hemp and cannabis research are opening up.
Cornell University is one of the institutions currently taking hemp and cannabis research to the next level. The Mattson lab, in conjunction with the GLASE group, recently carried out several different experiments. One of these experiments focused on the effects of supplemental lighting on hemp yields of both dry bud or total CBD and THC content after harvest. LED grow lights have become more prevalent in the cannabis industry; understanding how cannabis performs under these lights and how much of the difference is due to spectrum versus hardware is an important area of focus. The researchers wanted to dig into how different combinations of red and blue LEDs, and one white LED treatment, compared to an HPS treatment, as well as ceramic metal halide (CMH). Eight total supplemental light treatments were set up, and a single variety of hemp was grown side by side in a greenhouse environment.
So, what did they find? Interestingly, white LEDs performed just as well as the HPS, and better than some of the red and blue LED combos or CMH, when it came to dry bud weight. However, none of the lights came out as an overwhelming winner. This tells us that, while there might be some slight differences in results, good biomass yields can be obtained under any light type under an experienced grower. CBD and THC content of harvested buds was examined next. There has been a lot of discussion revolving around whether light type or spectrum could influence our overall THC or CBD content; this experiment offered the perfect chance to dig into that. Overall, CBD levels stayed between 8-12 percent for all light treatments. THC showed a similar indifference to light; plants were allowed to go “hot” and averaged around 0.47 percent THC regardless of light.
Moving from the academic field to the private sector, companies such as Fluence also invest in testing and proving the lighting science behind their products. On a recent webinar, Fluence took a deep dive into the effects of both UV-B and far-red light on three different cannabis cultivars. The researchers took one high-THC cultivar, one high-CBD cultivar, and one balanced cultivar. Some growers suspect that higher amounts of cannabinoids may offer some protection from high-UV environments; other fear that UV light may break down cannabinoids during production. Data were gathered on fresh and dry bud weight, along with cannabinoid and terpene content for all varieties under all treatments. To design each treatment, plants were provided with a baseline of 1100 µmol/m2/s of broad-spectrum light, and either UV-B or far-red light were added on top.
So, what did they find? First, UV-B was found to stress and harm plants across all treatments. Fresh and dry bud weight decreased as the amount of UV-B light increased. This could have been a result of how the treatments were applied; UV-B lights were applied for either two, four, or six hours at the end of the photoperiod. The results of leaf rolling, necrosis, and damage to pistils at even the lowest treatment show us that researchers have not yet found an appropriate application level for cannabis. THC, CBD, and terpenes were not affected by UV light, but they also did not seem to offer any protection. With UV light, the “poison is in the dose”; small amounts of UV light aid in sanitation without stressing plants out. Tread carefully with UV lights!
Next, far red light was added on top of the background broad spectrum light. Ultimately, far red light seemed to function just like additional broad-spectrum lighting; buds were larger, but when they added the same amount of broad-spectrum light to an additional treatment, the same increase occurred. Far red light did not affect cannabinoid content or terpenes in any of the cultivars. Given this information, the researcher concluded that there was no real reason to include extra far-red light instead of additional broad-spectrum light. However, just adding far-red light is not the end of the story. Changing ratios of red to far-red light provoke different shade-avoidance responses (stretching) or leaf expansion. Researchers could dive deeper into these effects by adding red light alongside far-red in different ratios, to find out if plant height or fan leaf size and expansion can be manipulated through lighting choices.
These results might seem disappointing – no exciting and unique responses were observed, no huge scientific breakthroughs have been made. However, science isn’t all about huge breakthroughs. Debunking myths and proving consistency is just as important. Between just these two studies, growers can feel confident that they can grow cannabis no matter what light they choose, as long as it is bright enough. Growers can see that there’s still a lot to learn about UV-B light, and caution is needed when buying into less tested or more expensive technology. More and more universities are ramping up and publishing research into hemp; the coming months are sure to bring even more exciting news. Keep your eyes open and your lights on!
Genomic Evidence That Governmentally Produced Cannabis sativa Poorly Represents Genetic Variation Available in State Markets
Daniela Vergara, et al.
Published: 14 September 2021
DOI: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.668315/full
Question Investigated: Is government medical research into Cannabis using government-specific varieties even applicable to commercially and medically used varieties of cannabis?
Continue reading “Genomic Evidence That Governmentally Produced Cannabis sativa Poorly Represents Genetic Variation Available in State Markets”Calcium in Lettuce
Originally published in Greenhouse Grower
Calcium, though not a macronutrient, is essential for proper plant development. Plants absorb calcium both through their roots from nutrient solutions and through leaves and shoots during foliar applications. Xylem, the water-carrying network of cells within plants, transports calcium from the point of absorption upward through plant tissue. Transpiration powers this upward flow as the plant photosynthesizes and releases water molecules into the environment.
Calcium serves several important purposes within plants. Strong cell walls require calcium to be incorporated in their structure, with adequate supplies leading to well-formed, healthy leaves and stems. Several biological processes also employ calcium as a signaling molecule, keeping plant development on-track or responding to changing environments.
Lettuce is a long-cultivated crop; calcium requirements have been well documented and the differences between field and greenhouse production understood. Hydroponic lettuce production calls for 100-150 ppm calcium throughout the growth cycle, which must be supplied by the water rather than obtained from field soil. Tap water contains some calcium but often not enough to hit this target. Hydroponic producers may incorporate a calcium-nitrate-based fertilizer to provide both calcium and nitrogen to their crop. Calcium chloride at one pound per 100 gallons can also be applied as a foliar spray to help deliver calcium to leaves when transpiration is low.
In lettuce, calcium deficiency often manifests as tip burn on developing leaves. Tip burn gives leaf margins a burned or crinkled appearance and will affect their appearance throughout development. The damage continues to affect new leaves until the cause of the deficiency is remedied. Damaged tissue can go on to become necrotic, providing a potential point of entry for secondary Botrytis infection. Overall, tip burn reduces health, appearance, and shelf-life of lettuce heads and leaves.
Identifying the cause of calcium deficiency in lettuce can be a tricky topic, as it is not always caused by a lack of applied calcium. Since water carries calcium through the plant as transpiration occurs, calcium movement is dependent solely on transpiration rates. It will not matter how much calcium you supply to the root zone of your crop if you’re growing in a humid, low-transpiration environment. Conversely, overly dry conditions causing plants to close their stomates and cease transpiration may also lead to calcium deficiency.
Head lettuce is particularly susceptible to tip burn in humid environments. As lettuce heads develop, they enclose the apical meristem, or growing point, in an envelope of leaves. This creates a pocket of stagnant air which can be resistant to outside air movement. Stagnant air cuts down on transpiration at the growing point, leading to less calcium being delivered and developing leaves becoming misshapen and tip burned. Alternatively, in high-light, low humidity environments, lettuce will experience a surge in photosynthesis while closing off stomates to cut down on water loss. Again, movement of calcium is impeded within the plant even though there may be enough at the rootzone.
Remedying calcium deficiency first relies on identifying the cause. Step one is looking at the nutrient solution. Is there a high or low level of calcium in the base water? Is there a calcium source included in the recipe? Calcium is available over a wide pH range, so pH changes are often not necessary. Next, take a look at the environmental conditions. Appropriate airflow is essential, though it may require different equipment than other crops. Successful lettuce growers often utilize vertical airflow fans over horizontal airflow. The downward direction of airflow allows air to be forced into and around the protected growing point of head lettuce. A gentle and constant flow is all that is necessary – high air speeds can lead to stomatal closure and tip burn once more. Finally, make sure photoperiods and light levels are appropriate for lettuce. A daily light integral (DLI) of 17 mols/m2/d is ideal for lettuce production, with a photoperiod between 14-18 hours. Using these problem-solving strategies, growers can begin to identify and correct calcium deficiency and tip burn in their lettuce crops, resulting in a healthy, productive crop.
Light and Fungi in Plants
Greenhouse production allows growers the freedom to grow year-round. Though these structures are controlled and mostly protected from outdoor environments, seasonal trends still exert some influence on crop growth. In October and November, conditions such as shortening days, decreasing light intensities, and falling temperatures can contribute to a disease-promoting environment. Diseases, such as Botrytis blight and downy mildew, can begin to creep in. Growers should take advantage of all available tools to combat these issues. Using sanitation and environmental management practices is well understood, but how can lighting technology help? The use of supplementary lights increases light intensity, extends daylength or provides night interruption for photoperiod control and can provide extra heat. All of these variables play important roles when discussing disease control. This article will examine in detail how these strategies provide disease control assistance.
Downy Mildew and Botrytis Blight
Downy mildew diseases are caused by a variety of fungal pathogens. This group of diseases affects important CEA crops such as basil, spinach, and cucumber. Mild chlorosis, or yellowing, of the leaves often serves as the first sign that downy mildew has infected the crop. Soon afterward, sporangia, or spore-producing structures, appear on the undersides of leaves, and chlorotic patches can darken to purple or dark brown. Systemic symptoms may also manifest as general stunting and foliage distortion. Downy mildew devastates crop yields and quality. While downy mildew of basil thrives in warmer conditions, many other disease-causing species can thrive in conditions commonly encountered in the fall such as cool, wet environments. These conditions help promote the germination, growth, and spread of this disease. Host-specific inoculum are ubiquitous in the environment, so disease prevention is key.
Botrytis blight pops up all year long as one of the most common fungal diseases. Whether in the greenhouse or on harvested crops in storage, decaying plant matter plays host to clusters of fuzzy gray spores. This infected material can then serve as a new source of inoculum and spread to actively growing, healthy tissue. Due to its preference for high humidity and temperatures below 86°F, Botrytis blight flourishes in temperate climates. Though most commonly seen as post-harvest issues on fruits and vegetables, developing crops can also be infected with Botrytis blight when plant tissues become damaged or die. Fall conditions often produce slower, softer growth, leaving crops vulnerable to infection.
Relationship between Light and Disease
October is a time of change, and with changing seasons comes changing photoperiods. Shortening day lengths have a dramatic effect on many plants’ physiology. Flower and fruit initiation are often tied to day length but changing light and dark periods will also change how fungal infections grow and develop. For Botrytis, sclerotia (long-lasting survival structures) are formed exclusively during dark periods. Conidia (gray, fuzzy, spore-producing structures) production occurs during light periods. Sclerotia allow Botrytis to overwinter in soil or in the environment, providing a potential future source of inoculum, especially in greenhouses with dirt or gravel floors Additions of even small amounts of night-time light have been shown to prevent sclerotia development, though more research must be done to find more concrete strategies.
Light and dark periods also influence downy mildew. Previous research has shown that downy mildew requires a period of dark to begin sporulation, rather than the light periods for Botrytis. Researchers in Israel showed that the presence of as little as 10 micromoles of red light applied during nighttime hours provided significant inhibition of spore production in downy mildew-inoculated basil crops. The protective effect of red light decreased as plants grew larger and shaded lower leaves, preventing the red light from penetrating the canopy. This strategy holds promise for producers of young plants, when intracanopy shading is minimal.
Overall, night interruption provides positive effects for both downy mildew and Botrytis. For red light choose fluorescent or light-emitting diode (LED) light sources. Dimmable LEDs provide strong flexibility, as they have the capability to provide intensities for both supplemental and photoperiodic light.
Moving beyond photoperiod, growers must also consider changing temperature conditions. Temperatures naturally decrease during fall and winter. With changing ambient temperatures, control strategies will also change. As air temperatures decrease, the dew point, or the point when water begins to condense onto surfaces, falls. Water condenses on surfaces that are cooler than the air, such as the undersides of leaves or metal and glass structural components. These falling temperatures and increased moisture allow for increased growth and spread of both downy mildew and Botrytis blight. Just four hours or less of free moisture on leaf surfaces is enough for Botrytis to invade healthy tissue.
The addition of supplemental light provides an extra source of heat and increases light intensity as ambient light declines. Some lights, such as high-pressure sodium fixtures, release more heat to the production space in the direction of the plant canopy. Efficient LEDs release less heat to the plant canopy, but still provide some convective heat to the air within the production space. With their varying heat output and very different light spectrums, growers can choose a lighting source that makes the most sense for their operation’s needs.
Finally, light spectrum itself affects each of these pathogens differently. Studies have shown that red light has been most effective at preventing downy mildew sporulation to date. However, Botrytis spp. also possess a rich array of photoreceptors, allowing them to respond to different wavelengths of light. These photoreceptors interact in a complicated way, but researchers have begun to draw some basic conclusions. When light is present, blue light appears to be key in suppressing the development of Botrytis conidia. Though other wavebands and ratios promote sporulation by signaling changes in the environment (such as the red to far-red ratio signaling shade), researchers are currently looking into how blue light applications overcomes these signals. Providing more daytime blue light may ultimately help suppress active sporulation of Botrytis infections.
Clearly, lighting the greenhouse in fall and winter provides more than just photosynthetic power for plants. Whether growers supply red photoperiodic light or additional daytime blue light, the use of lighting technology to fight diseases is simply another tool to add to the greenhouse grower’s toolbox. Understanding these disease suppression and prevention benefits can provide a greater return on investment when considering supplemental and photoperiodic lighting for your operation.
First report of the powdery mildew pathogen of hops, Podosphaeria macularis, naturally infecting cannabis (Cannabis sativa L., marijuana) plants under field conditions.
Zamir K Punja
Published: 22 Sept 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2021.1960424
Question Investigated: Is there more than one species of powdery mildew that infects cannabis, and is there cross infectivity between different crops such as hops?
Plants Used: Chronic Rider, outdoor grow in Fraser, BC
Picture shows the difference in appearance between two species of PM causing fungi infecting cannabis.
Main Takeaways:
– Different species of fungi can cause powdery mildew in cannabis.
– A common species of PM affecting cannabis in greenhouses is Golovinomyces ambrosiae.
– Hops PM species is Podosphaeria macularis
– Different species of fungi will result in slightly different appearances of powdery mildew on cannabis leaves.
– Though usually crop-specific, related crops can sometimes be affected by the same species of fungi that cause powdery mildew, such as in this case where PM from hops jumped over to cannabis.
– With different fungal species, we may see that different fungicides have slightly different efficacies.
– Monitor environmental conditions and keep track of which sprays are working or not working for your crops in your area. Scout, treat, record!